Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.
|
304 heads, chamber size, compression ratio, cast#? |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | ||
pauldana
AMC Fan Joined: Oct/20/2010 Location: Lancaster, Ca. Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: Oct/20/2010 at 2:28pm |
|
ok.... I am trying to rebuild my sons 304 up to give it a little bit more power... and i dont want to go to a 360 or 401....i want to stay with the 304. that being said.... My understanding is that in 72 the chamber size of the heads increased, thus bringing down compression..... what chamber size are 72 heads? what chamber size are 71 and earlier heads? what can be done to decrees chamber size, ie deck the heads? and how far can you deck them? deck the block? how much can you deck off the block? bigger size valves to decrees chamber size? what are the casting numbers of the smaller size heads? what are the casting numbers of the larger chamber size heads? was also informed that chevy 305 pistons will work with some boring work and bring up the compression... ??? thoughts???? thx, Paul
|
||
bigbad69
Supporter of TheAMCForum Joined: Jul/02/2007 Location: Ottawa, Ont. Status: Offline Points: 6669 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Everything you wanted to know about AMC V8 head castings courtesy Dave Crooks.
http://www3.sympatico.ca/david.crooks/AMC_HEAD_DESIGN.pdf |
||
69 Javelin SST BBO 390 T10
|
||
Mean71
Supporter of TheAMCForum Joined: Mar/01/2010 Location: Chicago, IL Status: Offline Points: 779 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm no expert on the matter, but I believe the early '71 heads are about 8-10 cc's smaller than the later '71+ heads. I heard you can mill the heads to get about .2 points of compression, but even if you're gonna get the engine machined, put on the smaller chamber heads, and if you got higher compression pistons it's still only gonna come up to about a 15-25 hp gain. 304's aren't very good for building up...in the long run you're kind of just throwing money away. The same improvements would give you twice an improvement in a 360 or 401. In my opinion, the best thing you can do that would be worth your money would be to get a 4bbl set up and maybe some headers. That should put you up to about 180-190 net hp.
Edited by Mean71 - Oct/20/2010 at 2:43pm |
||
pauldana
AMC Fan Joined: Oct/20/2010 Location: Lancaster, Ca. Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
will check it out and read it... thx...
|
||
idrambler
Supporter of TheAMCForum Joined: Jul/02/2007 Location: Nampa,Idaho Status: Offline Points: 2942 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
304 heads....
70/early 71 52.2cc ... casting # 319-9517 late 71 and later 58.92cc 74 and later bridged style... |
||
Jim....AMCRC
Treasure Valley AMC Club, Pres 69 AMX 401/727 74 GremlinX 401/727race only 73 Matador 2dr HT 360/727 |
||
pauldana
AMC Fan Joined: Oct/20/2010 Location: Lancaster, Ca. Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
with a good cam change and some good head work, and of course manifold changes, i believe i should be able to get 300hp and ~375 tq.... these should not be hard to reach numbers... i got 440tq and 460hp at the rear wheels through an irs rear-end, from my 383 build.... thats well over 550 at the crank.... im only looking for 300 out of the AMC 304///......
|
||
pauldana
AMC Fan Joined: Oct/20/2010 Location: Lancaster, Ca. Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
74 and later bridged style...????? can you explain? what are the chamber sizes? will they work on a 72 block? thx.. p will the 71 and earlier heads work on a 71 block? where can i find "70/early 71 52.2cc ... casting # 319-9517"
Edited by pauldana - Oct/20/2010 at 2:52pm |
||
Mean71
Supporter of TheAMCForum Joined: Mar/01/2010 Location: Chicago, IL Status: Offline Points: 779 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The heads on the 304 are pretty pitiful--trust me, I've looked up all of this before because I have a 304 in my Javelin. There was a guy on here that did everything you want to do plus he bored and stroked the engine and only made about 280 gross rated hp. With a 360 no, those numbers wouldn't be hard to reach. Unfortunately the 304 doesn't react much to performance upgrades... I'm sure you could buy some nice heads for a 304, get a nice cam and do a bunch of machining, but by the time it's all said and done you could have built yourself a 360 with more horsepower for the same amount of money. Actually, if you look up my older posts, I came on these forums originally hoping to do the same thing as you. I've seen people literally giving away 360's. Edited by Mean71 - Oct/20/2010 at 2:58pm |
||
poormansMACHINE
AMC Addicted Charter Member Joined: Jun/28/2007 Location: Shoemaker-Levy9 Status: Offline Points: 12302 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That's nice. You're working with an undersquare engine that's breathing impaired because of it. |
||
billd
Moderator Group Forum Administrator Joined: Jun/27/2007 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 30894 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I agree - good luck............ it's not just CID, it's pumping efficiency. The 304 ain't got it, and has trouble getting it.
|
||
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |