TheAMCForum.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Competition > Drag Racing
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Aerodynamics of the Gremlin
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Click for TheAMCForum Rules / Click for PDF version of Forum Rules
Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.

Aerodynamics of the Gremlin

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
WesternRed View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Aug/03/2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5787
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WesternRed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Aerodynamics of the Gremlin
    Posted: May/15/2023 at 11:36pm
Just have a few random thoughts about aerodynamic things.

According to history, Wally Booth ran both the Gremlin and Hornet hatch with the exact same driveline and the Hornet was 3 mph faster, ending the career of the Gremlin in super pro stock racing (let me know if this is inaccurate).

Have to assume the difference was mostly due to aerodynamics, now the front half of the Gremlin and Hornet is pretty much the same, so presumably the difference in rear body shape is the issue.

What can be done to improve the aerodynamic performance of the basic Gremlin body and how much difference could it make? I notice a few people running roof extensions off the back of the car and Kevin has some fancy little winglets on the back of his Gremlin.





Edited by WesternRed - May/16/2023 at 3:17am
I've finally given up drinking for good...........now I only drink for evil.
Back to Top
mixed up View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Jun/16/2015
Location: Monroe mich
Status: Offline
Points: 2153
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mixed up Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/16/2023 at 12:49am
just the back shape of the gremlin would cause drag stick shifter a forum member has some kind of v shaped things on the side of his gremlin by the back of the car anything that would eliminate air of the back like a wing would help take drag of the back
69 amx 290 auto
65 220 290 4spd
80 ford fairmont
Back to Top
PROSTOCKTOM View Drop Down
Supporter of TheAMCForum
Supporter of TheAMCForum
Avatar

Joined: Jun/20/2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 2424
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote PROSTOCKTOM Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/16/2023 at 2:03am
Originally posted by WesternRed WesternRed wrote:

Just have a few random thoughts about aerodynamic things.

According to history, Wally Booth ran both the Gremlin and Hornet hatch with the exact same driveline and the Hornet was 3 mph faster, ending the career of the Gremlin in super stock racing (let me know if this is inaccurate).

It was in Pro Stock 1973, not Super Stock.

When Maskin & Kanners debuted the Hornet X in Gainesville (Gator Nationals) 1973 it was running 4-5 MPH faster with the same drivetrain that they were using in their prior Gremlin. 

M&K "Hornets average speed was in excess of 3-1/2 MPH faster and .012 to .013 second quicker." than Wally's Gremlin. Wally had dynoed both his and M&K's engines and they were both within 5HP per Wally Booth.

Also note that a Gremlin is 98" wheelbase and a Hornet is 108"

Tom
Molnar Technologies Full Service Dealer - Crankshafts & Connecting Rods

1969 AMC Rambler Rouge Race Car
1974 AMC Hornet Hatchback, Wally Booth Outlaw Nostalgic Pro Stock Race Car Project
Back to Top
WesternRed View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Aug/03/2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5787
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WesternRed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/16/2023 at 3:27am
Fixed the link in my first post, some interesting data there for those who are interested.

Tom, I used to think that Wally actually swapped out the engine at the track, but makes more sense that they would compare performance between cars with the same engine output. From some online reading, the difference in ET was 0.15 seconds and 3.5 mph, quite a significant improvement. Not sure if the wheelbase difference would make much of a difference in ET and MPH, but would probably help with stability. Any other differences? A production Hornet is probably heavier than the Gremlin, but pro stock would presumably have some weight requirement that had to be met. 

Mixed Up, Stickshifter = Kevin in my original post, wonder how much difference those things make.
I've finally given up drinking for good...........now I only drink for evil.
Back to Top
WesternRed View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Aug/03/2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 5787
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WesternRed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/16/2023 at 6:09pm
Ok, not sure how accurate this number is but apparently the Gremlin has an Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient of 0.49, which is pretty woeful by today's standards.

Cand find any numbers for the Hornet so far but apparently the Pacer was much more efficient at 0.32 (or 0.43 depending on source), would be good to have some verifiable data.
I've finally given up drinking for good...........now I only drink for evil.
Back to Top
PROSTOCKTOM View Drop Down
Supporter of TheAMCForum
Supporter of TheAMCForum
Avatar

Joined: Jun/20/2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 2424
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PROSTOCKTOM Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/16/2023 at 8:16pm
Originally posted by WesternRed WesternRed wrote:

A production Hornet is probably heavier than the Gremlin, but pro stock would presumably have some weight requirement that had to be met. 



Pro Stock back then ran on a pounds per cubic in formula that had lots of variables, but the weight they ran under per my 1974 NHRA rule book would have been 

6.65 pounds per cubic inch for car with 105" wheelbase or less and 6.45 pounds per cubic inch for cars with 105" wheelbase or longer.

Since they ran engines in the 340"-345" range your looking at a Gremlin weight of 2261 to 2294# min.

The Hornet would have weighed 2193 to 2225# min.

So when the Milan testing was done M&K's Hornet could have weighed 70 pounds less than Wally's Gremlin.

When I talked to Wally Booth at The AMC Homecoming 2017 he told me the most powerful engine he ever had made 585HP

Tom


Edited by PROSTOCKTOM - May/16/2023 at 8:19pm
Molnar Technologies Full Service Dealer - Crankshafts & Connecting Rods

1969 AMC Rambler Rouge Race Car
1974 AMC Hornet Hatchback, Wally Booth Outlaw Nostalgic Pro Stock Race Car Project
Back to Top
Jeff Lee View Drop Down
AMC Apprentice
AMC Apprentice


Joined: May/14/2023
Location: Anthem AZ
Status: Offline
Points: 160
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Jeff Lee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/16/2023 at 8:54pm
My last Stock Eliminator 390 dyno’ed @ 555 HP. But it had the R4b and 780 Holley which were legal at the time. Come a long way! 
Back to Top
PAGAENT View Drop Down
AMC Apprentice
AMC Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: Jan/16/2020
Location: 93446
Status: Offline
Points: 140
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PAGAENT Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/16/2023 at 9:15pm
Actual measurements taken at El Mirage dry lake gave a value of .46 for my Pinto, in 1993 a Ford Probe was rated at .29-.32 depending on model. I would be surprised if a Pacer was anywhere near that. In addition to the CD you also have to account for the frontal area which the Pacer has an excess of. Juggling the cars attitude could effect your CD and would be easy to try at the track with front or rear spacers.
Pat Gary
Back to Top
Hurst390 View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Apr/20/2008
Location: secret
Status: Offline
Points: 5752
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Hurst390 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/17/2023 at 8:40am
Its on record here that Wallys best engine was 820hp
SC/Hurst Rambler

11.62 120

100% Street Legal
Back to Top
CamJam View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: Jan/04/2014
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Points: 6475
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CamJam Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/17/2023 at 11:02am
I'm guessing .43 would be more accurate for the Pacer.  My Opel GT, which was considered pretty aerodynamic at the time, is .41.  The C3 Corvette was .44.
'73 Javelin 360 (current project)
'72 Baja Bronze Javelin SST
'69 Big Bad Orange AMX (2018 Teague Heritage Award) SOLD

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.
All content of this site Copyright © 2018 TheAMCForum unless otherwise noted, all rights reserved.
PROBLEMS LOGGING IN or REGISTERING:
If you have problems logging in or registering, then please contact a Moderator or