Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.
|
390 crank |
Post Reply |
Author | |
scramboy
AMC Nut Joined: Apr/12/2009 Location: new york Status: Offline Points: 456 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: Aug/02/2022 at 7:28pm |
I recently had some issues and spun a couple of rod bearings in my 68 390. My crank guy wants to weld a journal to get it to .030 under! Seems unacceptable to me. Can i use the crank like that or is there a smaller journal that can be used with an offset grind? Anyone have a combination like that? Any insight will be appreciated.
|
|
Trader
AMC Addicted Joined: May/15/2018 Location: Ontario Status: Offline Points: 6881 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Welding out the crankshaft, which is fine by the way at a competent shop, why not go back to stock? Should not cost much more.
The other option is going to 2.1" journal Chev rods and building something like this: The Chev route would likely be cheaper and has a proven record for durability.
|
|
DragRacingSpirit
AMC Addicted Joined: May/27/2009 Location: Mo Status: Offline Points: 903 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Nothing wrong with welding the journals if done by a reputable and experienced shop. It is a steel crank and is repairable. If I were in your position, unless you just want it stock, I would use a 2.1" chevy journal rod and set the stroke to whatever is reasonable with a 6" or even a 5.850 chevy rod and no oil ring supports necessary. If going back to stock set it at std. rod journal size not undersize. Remember to do this you will have to buy custom pistons and chevy rods. For a street engine make sure you have a fully supported oil ring, ie (no ring supports required) so do the math and set your stroke accordingly for your deck height and rod length.
|
|
Best 1/4 mile 8.99, 1/8 mile 5.71, 60 foot 1.27, no power adders
|
|
PROSTOCKTOM
Supporter of TheAMCForum Joined: Jun/20/2010 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 2450 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The biggest issue with repairing and turning it .030" under is finding bearings in today's World. If you intend to weld it then have it taken back to a standard AMC dimension. Also a Chevy rod is not the same offset as an AMC rod, so should you head down that road you need to make sure the rods you use have the AMC offset. I am a Molnar dealer and they offer 6.00" length rods in 2.00" & 2.100" rod journals. Turning the crank to 2.100" sounds a lot easier in print than it will end up in the end. You'll easily add $2000 to the project. Pay the crank grinder and put it all back together is a lot simpler.
Tom
|
|
Molnar Technologies Full Service Dealer - Crankshafts & Connecting Rods
1969 AMC Rambler Rouge Race Car 1974 AMC Hornet Hatchback, Wally Booth Outlaw Nostalgic Pro Stock Race Car Project |
|
TomCombo
AMC Fan Joined: Feb/07/2011 Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Tom - Can you explain AMC offset on the rods? I’m learning. Thanks!
|
|
garland performce
AMC Apprentice Joined: Nov/19/2013 Location: sibley mo Status: Offline Points: 172 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
SBC rods have a different offset for the piston due to bore spacing
Molnar make 2.100 and 2.00 rods with amc offset
|
|
BassBoat
AMC Addicted Joined: Aug/29/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1719 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
When you say "has anybody" I have taken a 390 crank to 2.0 journal and 3.8 stroke. I used 5.85 chevrolet rods from Eagle and had the off side chamferred so I could reverse them to correct the offset. If i were to do it over I would take advantage of the Molnar stroker rods.
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |