Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.
|
Flat head combustion chamber |
Post Reply | Page 123 11> |
Author | |
43n
AMC Fan Joined: Feb/28/2021 Location: Mesa AZ Status: Offline Points: 29 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: Mar/17/2021 at 10:50pm |
I would like to see the combustion chamber shape on the 196 flathead engine. Although I downloaded the 1965 TSM I did not find a bottom view of the cylinder head
Showing the combustion chamber Maybe someone could post a photograph? Is there a desirable amount to mill the head for a little boost in compression? |
|
tyrodtom
AMC Addicted Joined: Sep/14/2007 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 6213 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Be aware that when you mill a flathead you restrict the ability for the intake and exhaust charges to get from the combustion chamber to the valves.
In the mid 60's I had a Fenton aluminum head that was already supposed to have a 8.5 to 1 ratio, I had it milled .030, put it on, it was slower. Ended up taking the head back off and relieving the block between the valves and cylinder, which lost me some compression, but allowed the engine to breathe .
|
|
66 American SW, 66 American 2dr, 82 J10, 70 Hornet, Pound, Va.
|
|
43n
AMC Fan Joined: Feb/28/2021 Location: Mesa AZ Status: Offline Points: 29 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thank you!
I had been thinking about the extra restriction caused by milling the head...And unique to the Nash /AMC flathead design the intake channel now is also reduced in volume Some flathead sites caution that the amount of flow lost above the valve is significant and often overlooked Did you happen to Check the cranking compression pressure before and after the .030” cut? The manual says 130 psi is stock… Even though the OHV 196 gives 145 psi..That’s what I was hoping for |
|
tyrodtom
AMC Addicted Joined: Sep/14/2007 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 6213 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I don't remember, that was 55 years ago.
But the stock compression ratio was 8 to 1, and the Fenton head was 8.5 , then I squeezed that. I had access to some old 50's speed mags that even gave advice on hot rod Nash 6 cylinders. They recommended the .030 head cut., but that was for a stock 53- 55 head, that might have been even lower compression than the 59 American my 196 was in.
|
|
66 American SW, 66 American 2dr, 82 J10, 70 Hornet, Pound, Va.
|
|
tomj
AMC Addicted Joined: Jan/27/2010 Location: earth Status: Offline Points: 7544 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Still need photos? I have a block and head handy. The block is outside (yard ornament) because it has six cracks, so it will have to wait til morning.
Flatheads are terrible designs. This does not stop me from wanting to build and drive one. I even have a supercharger ready to go; never mind breathing, use a belt-driven hammer to get air in there (and increase it's already awful cooling issues) (I have a plan for that too). If I could only find a non-ruined one. Hauling 600 lbs of sticky rust around and dissasembling and paying good money to clean and check is getting tedious. |
|
1960 Rambler Super two-door wagon, OHV auto
1961 Roadster American, 195.6 OHV, T5 http://www.ramblerLore.com |
|
43n
AMC Fan Joined: Feb/28/2021 Location: Mesa AZ Status: Offline Points: 29 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Of course… Sometimes I can’t remember things that I did 55 minutes ago!
Flathead engine cylinder heads & transfer areas always fight the compromise between flow and compression. The flow will give you horsepower… The higher compression will give you efficiency.… Which do we want? ..All depends on how we intend to use the engine. Thought I should look at what’s been done in the past That is why I would like to see the AMC cylinder head combustion chamber first .. And then investigate some of the newer shapes such as the junior dragster/Briggs & Stratton & clone engines I did review your flathead supercharged plan… Certainly finding a suitable block would be a big step… like a NOS complete short block Incidentally I found a lot more AMC cars on “Offer Up” as compared to Craigslist Thanks |
|
tomj
AMC Addicted Joined: Jan/27/2010 Location: earth Status: Offline Points: 7544 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'll take photos tomorrow and post.
|
|
1960 Rambler Super two-door wagon, OHV auto
1961 Roadster American, 195.6 OHV, T5 http://www.ramblerLore.com |
|
tomj
AMC Addicted Joined: Jan/27/2010 Location: earth Status: Offline Points: 7544 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Head photos follow. I took some low-grade measurements; the location, then the caliper reading. The steel rule is .045" thick, you do the math. So lovely, so terrible. I did the other valve pocket, but it's the same, so no upload. I could have sworn I did the "combustion chamber" but I lost the photo; no matter it's pretty much equal to the valve pocket. here's #5, unencumbered. |
|
1960 Rambler Super two-door wagon, OHV auto
1961 Roadster American, 195.6 OHV, T5 http://www.ramblerLore.com |
|
43n
AMC Fan Joined: Feb/28/2021 Location: Mesa AZ Status: Offline Points: 29 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
WOW! Thank you for the over-the-top effort in taking these photographs.…
To say I am in shock is an understatement ...really makes you wonder what they were thinking in this design?? Do you think this shape was typical all the way from 1941 through 65?… Hard to criticize especially if they spent many many dynamometer hours developing this |
|
tomj
AMC Addicted Joined: Jan/27/2010 Location: earth Status: Offline Points: 7544 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Here's the 1958 block that head was on. It's sad junk.
The undercut (cast) here is about .15". See how terrible the valve shrouding is! It's terrible! OHV too. |
|
1960 Rambler Super two-door wagon, OHV auto
1961 Roadster American, 195.6 OHV, T5 http://www.ramblerLore.com |
|
Post Reply | Page 123 11> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |