Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.
|
Strut Rod FIX |
Post Reply | Page 123 11> |
Author | |
White70JavelinSST
Supporter of TheAMCForum Joined: Aug/08/2012 Location: Minnesota Status: Offline Points: 4867 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: May/20/2016 at 4:59pm |
I found these while wandering the internet looking for a better answer.
They're from Total Control Products out of Scaramento CA. They're made for a Mustang. $519 a pair. What do you think? If they just had the flat blade on the end they would fit the 70 Javelin/AMX. If it had the end with the steering stop on it, it would fit others. With a bit of adaption these would fit almost any AMC. The end that fits into the strut rod bracket is a True Center Pivot Socket with 12 degrees of deflection. Anyone else seen anything similar? |
|
70 Javelin SST, second owner, purchased 1972
|
|
304-dude
AMC Addicted Joined: Sep/29/2008 Location: Central Illinoi Status: Offline Points: 9081 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
|
We have discused similar rod designs... they all place the pivot closer to the lower control arm, which defeats the perpose.
Eventually I will get around to making a custom set to show my design, which allows proper pivot location and looks very stock with stock adjustability. Imagine a spherical bearing welded at the center of the bracket. While the rod slides through and is secured by adjusting nuts, washers and lightly modified bushings to seal /cover, and add shock dampening for the bearing. Quite simple and effective. Just need to save about $100.00 to obtain parts and weld. |
|
71 Javelin SST body
390 69 crank, 70 block & heads NASCAR SB2 rods & pistons 78 Jeep TH400 w/ 2.76 Low 50/50 Ford-AMC Suspension 79 F150 rear & 8.8 axles Ford Racing 3.25 gears & 9" /w Detroit locker |
|
Red Devil
AMC Addicted Joined: Jul/10/2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1743 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
304-dude,
Something like this: It really wants to have a spherical bushing both at the strut rod pivot and at the lower arm pivot at the cross-member. Stock rubber bushings do the job, but don't locate positively. A spherical joint at the strut rod chassis pivot requires a bit more deflection at the cross-member bushing. Sphericals at both ends of the strut rod take stress off the lower arm pivot at the cross-member, but introduces an additional unwanted degree of freedom. If going with a spherical bushing or heim at the strut rod chassis connection, my recommendation would be to fit one also at the arm cross-member pivot, but it may be too harsh for normal street use and need some reinforcing. Hope this helps,RD
Edited by Red Devil - May/20/2016 at 6:33pm |
|
304-dude
AMC Addicted Joined: Sep/29/2008 Location: Central Illinoi Status: Offline Points: 9081 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Close, but the spherical DOM 15 bearing will have a cup welded in the opening of the bracket. Instead of the cup being centered it will be 65% towareds the back so that the pivot will be more at the bracket centerline. So you know... the combo of spherical bearing in the bracket with the two bushings, work together as one. The bearing being more to center the pivot, while poly bushings allow for shock and stiffer suspension travel. May need to have custom rods made to keep deflection down by flex. But this is road use not rally. What I plan to do is cup out two poly bushings and use them in conjunction to help control shock to the cup and bearing. Plus allow for keeping the bearing clean, almost maintenance free. I also was thinking of doing sphericals at the crossmeber end... probably will do it, just I get one track minded in doing new tricks one at a time. Like to see what does what and work from there. In a way it allowed me to think of unconventional ways to do things. I think my cousine finally rubbed off on me. He makes do with the simplest and oddest fixes. Amazes me on his barn yard ways, that here I use to spend money to do what he has done with none. Ha! As for angle of deflection... I also will be adding a block to keep the suspension at body rest under load. Thus, the wheels will never drop. Another thing is my suspension is dropped by suspension travel, not by dropping plates. I will be using HD Hornet springs, shock packers for bump stops, and spring wedges if needed for adjustability without need of changing springs. Without use of the 2 inch bump stops, I will have moved suspension travel higher than stock, but will limit by use of packers appropriately. I have moved my stock suspension outside the AMC box a wee bit, with track in mind. Not ride comfort, though I do prefer a stiff ride over cushy. Wife still is contimplating why she allowed getting the 09 Honda Accord Coupe, it makes her feel like a BB in a box car. If I can make my Javelin feel a wee stuffer, you wont hear me complain. RedDevil, thanks for your input and nice picture of your design. Not that we think the same, just glad to see someone design with proper function, not just a flashy questionable fix. Edited by 304-dude - May/20/2016 at 7:24pm |
|
71 Javelin SST body
390 69 crank, 70 block & heads NASCAR SB2 rods & pistons 78 Jeep TH400 w/ 2.76 Low 50/50 Ford-AMC Suspension 79 F150 rear & 8.8 axles Ford Racing 3.25 gears & 9" /w Detroit locker |
|
Red Devil
AMC Addicted Joined: Jul/10/2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1743 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
304-dude,
Just to clarify, the picture I posted was just snagged from the Web - it's not my design and not one I'd promote as it uses a plain spherical radial bearing in a mostly thrust application (there are thrust type sphericals available, but typicaly limited to about +/- 7deg so not quite enough). There are lots of variations for Mustangs, so most could be adapted to AMCs. Quick web search for Mustang adjustable strut rod will find lots of versions. Whether or not it's a good idea to stray from stock rubber bushings ... well, just make sure whatever you fit is stronger than stock so there are no unfortunate incidents at speed. Keep it safe, RD. |
|
304-dude
AMC Addicted Joined: Sep/29/2008 Location: Central Illinoi Status: Offline Points: 9081 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for your input on proper bearing usage and your concerns for safty. I have yet to make my decision, have a plan, will find what will work or make do with what may work for Fords. Though it will take more money to convert what is available than to just go and make it. Again. The design is allowing the bushings to do the work, the bearing is just to keep pivot stable. So bearing failure should not be dramatic. My only concern I the grade of steel in the strut rod. After seeing a few break and bend... I may just have to customize with a better grade of steel to replace the factory strut rod. I already done over kill on my rack tie rods, may do the same for the stut rods. Again, once I get the spherical bearing in proper with enough usable angle I'll move to further mods to keep it safe. |
|
71 Javelin SST body
390 69 crank, 70 block & heads NASCAR SB2 rods & pistons 78 Jeep TH400 w/ 2.76 Low 50/50 Ford-AMC Suspension 79 F150 rear & 8.8 axles Ford Racing 3.25 gears & 9" /w Detroit locker |
|
White70JavelinSST
Supporter of TheAMCForum Joined: Aug/08/2012 Location: Minnesota Status: Offline Points: 4867 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Lots of great responses !
I can tell you guys have been thinking of a better solution too. I certainly have decided that poly bushings are great, but lookout, one mis-move or memory lapse of how to take care of them and a strut rod can break. |
|
70 Javelin SST, second owner, purchased 1972
|
|
tomj
AMC Addicted Joined: Jan/27/2010 Location: earth Status: Offline Points: 7522 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
half-poly (front) and half-rubber (rear) is a decent compromise; lots of compliance for bump and such, but the relative precision of the poly. only half the squeak too :-)
|
|
1960 Rambler Super two-door wagon, OHV auto
1961 Roadster American, 195.6 OHV, T5 http://www.ramblerLore.com |
|
WesternRed
AMC Addicted Joined: Aug/03/2010 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 5787 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
304-dude
AMC Addicted Joined: Sep/29/2008 Location: Central Illinoi Status: Offline Points: 9081 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
WesternRed, nice representation of a custom ball joint setup from a member. I had contemplated using a modified truck balljoint without need of any welding to the AMC components. I would cut the cup areas out at the radius for welding to steel centering bushings, machine off the stud from the ball, and drill out a hole to have the tie rod slip through. Still using dished out poly bushings for concealment and sealing from the elements. My main concern is how I am to deal with the stock strut rod rigidity. May use a quartered split steel tube as a reinforcement sheath to be welded along the length. As for the weakness of the threaded end, will weld a barrel to a thicker locknut to fit over the modified tie rod diameter. The DOM 15 spherical cupped bearing option had put the idea of the truck ball joint asside for some time, mainly because the extra work to customize a big ball joint. How it all fits is by compression of the components when assembled. The dished out bushings allow for the fitment over the modified truck balljoint, the big washers are to keep everything sandwiched together. Again my design only uses the ball joint mod as a centerting locator to the pivot of the tie rods action. It is not a main component to strength or durability of the tie rod's action, unlike everyone elses design. It may be a compromise between the harshness of bushing eliminatiors and the polly bushings without changing pivot distance away from stock. It adds ease of install with stock components with stock adjustment as well. Though customization of the tie rod by strengthening, is optional to ones needs. Edited by 304-dude - May/22/2016 at 6:25am |
|
71 Javelin SST body
390 69 crank, 70 block & heads NASCAR SB2 rods & pistons 78 Jeep TH400 w/ 2.76 Low 50/50 Ford-AMC Suspension 79 F150 rear & 8.8 axles Ford Racing 3.25 gears & 9" /w Detroit locker |
|
Post Reply | Page 123 11> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |