![]() |
|
Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.
|
Postal Jeep 232 |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
kronik
AMC Apprentice
Joined: Jun/13/2011 Location: Oregon Status: Offline Points: 98 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Postal Jeep 232Posted: Apr/13/2012 at 12:02pm |
|
Somebody local is selling a 232 motor / torqueflite 727 tranny from a postal jeep. It doesn't say what year of jeep it came out of and i haven't gotten a hold of the guy yet. I was wondering if anybody knows whether or not it would fit right into a 64-69 american. For the price that he's asking, I wouldn't mind having an extra one laying around.
Here's a few pics... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
61 American
62 American 65 American 67 American 69 American 69 Rambler 220 wagon |
|
![]() |
|
tyrodtom
AMC Addicted
Joined: Sep/14/2007 Location: Virginia Status: Online Points: 2872 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr/13/2012 at 12:21pm |
|
I don't know much about automatics, but that isn't a 727 transmission, it looks like one of the light duty air cooled BW transmissions.
It's a pre-72 engine, it will fit your chassis with easy modifications. Edited by tyrodtom - Apr/13/2012 at 12:23pm |
|
|
66 American SW, 66 American 2dr, 82 J10, 70 Hornet, Pound, Va.
|
|
![]() |
|
1968AMC770Wagon
AMC Addicted
Joined: Jan/09/2009 Location: CT Status: Offline Points: 1140 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr/13/2012 at 12:21pm |
|
The engine is a definite yes. Not sure about the 727, but someone else will. It is Pre 72, based on the starter being on the left hand side. Just like the engine in your American.
|
|
![]() |
|
1968AMC770Wagon
AMC Addicted
Joined: Jan/09/2009 Location: CT Status: Offline Points: 1140 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr/13/2012 at 12:23pm |
|
Im almost positive that it is a BW 35. If that is the case, it will also swap in easily. This looks like a pre 72 engine and tranny. I would still pick it up if its cheap, looks extremely complete.
|
|
![]() |
|
ramblinfsj
AMC Addicted
Joined: Jul/07/2007 Location: Lubbock, Texas Status: Offline Points: 1550 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr/13/2012 at 12:40pm |
|
Yeah, it would be an easy swap. I like the fact that the driveshaft comes with it too. You will need it. The tranny looks to be an updated model of the BW 35 because it is radiator cooled instead of air cooled. I think it's like a Model 43 or something like that. See if he has the speedometer cable too. The motor has the engine mount brackets on it too which is helpful. The engine mounts will sit in front of the original crossmember about 2 or 3 inches so you will have to weld some metal to the crossmember to fill the gap. I've do it, it's easy. Getting a driveshaft made will be the hardest most expensive thing you should encounter. You'll need to have the mounts on your radiator swapped side for side. I'd buy it. I don't think you'll find such a complete package like that again.
Edit: Flipping the radiator mounts is only needed for the 64-65 year models. Welding metal to the crossmember for engine mounts is only needed if the car came with the 196 engine.
Edited by ramblinfsj - Apr/13/2012 at 12:45pm |
|
|
1982 Jeep J-20
1965 Rambler American 220 1978 Jeep Cherokee w/401 1962 Rambler Classic 400 1973 DJ-5 Postal Jeep 1979 Concord DL 2dr 1975 Matador Wagon |
|
![]() |
|
PlaneJob
AMC Fan
Joined: Apr/06/2012 Location: Wylie, TX Status: Offline Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr/13/2012 at 9:46pm |
|
Looks like the engine is out of a DJ5B. BW35 based tranny that they called the BW41 or BW43, or BW44 depending on which of the sources I talked to are right.
I've got the same setup in my 1971ish DJ5. That coat of orange paint looks recent... why? what is he hiding with paint?
|
|
![]() |
|
vinny
Supporter of TheAMCForum
Joined: Jan/05/2012 Location: Calgary Status: Offline Points: 505 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr/13/2012 at 10:11pm |
|
I have a 232 and BW M37 that came from a 67 American. The tailshaft housing I have looks much longer than the one you show.
|
|
![]() |
|
carnuck
AMC Addicted
Joined: Mar/31/2010 Location: Seattle Status: Offline Points: 1459 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr/15/2012 at 2:22am |
|
DJs were shorter trans because they didn't have much length.
|
|
![]() |
|
farna
Supporter of TheAMCForum
Moderator Lost Dealership Project Joined: Jul/08/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7132 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr/15/2012 at 8:56pm |
|
The engine will fit, should even have the short water pump and pulley, which makes it a real good find if it's going in a 64 or 65 American. The trans isn't an M-35, the 35 used a cable instead of a vacuum modulator. It's an M-37 most likely (which was just a bit stronger than the 35, used in early big cars with 232), but may be a M-4x. It's not air cooled either. The trans case has the vents so it could be air cooled, but the bell lacks the big air inlet opening on the right side, and there are trans cooling lines. That's no big deal though, fluid cooling is probably better, more consistent anyway (keeps a more even temp than air cooled would).
|
|
|
Frank Swygert
American Motors Cars Magazine www.amc-mag.com |
|
![]() |
|
amc67rogue
AMC Nut
Joined: Nov/05/2008 Location: Phx. AZ. Status: Offline Points: 438 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr/20/2012 at 2:50pm |
|
That looks like a 71 setup . 71 was the only yr. that the dipstick was directly in the main case , 70 and earlier it was in the side of the pan.
|
|
|
Keith Coggins 67Rogue X code
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |