TheAMCForum.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > The Garage > AMC 6 Cylinder Engine Repair and Modifications
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - New to the straight six
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Click for TheAMCForum Rules / Click for PDF version of Forum Rules
Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.

New to the straight six

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Message
Nick_m View Drop Down
AMC Apprentice
AMC Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: Mar/10/2014
Location: il
Status: Offline
Points: 93
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nick_m Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: New to the straight six
    Posted: Aug/29/2014 at 3:07am
Ok guys so i have a 1980 amc spirit with the 258 and a 3 speed auto.
I want some more power out of it no more than 300hp just because i want it as a driver too
Some of the things im looking into: the clifford intake with weber 38 carb and clifford dual exhaust header but after some research im not sure what i want to do

I guess my main question is where is a good place to start on the 258 (i want to keep it instead of swapping)

I thought about doing a 4.0 head with better intake and exhaust and upgraded fuel injection or carb and upgrading the ignition... do you think that's a good start? I'm new to the straight six and i want it to be a fun driver with enough power... i might add im not looking for top speed im more looking to have fun at a red light or two... i like the low end from the 258 and want to build off of that

Edited by Nick_m - Aug/29/2014 at 3:17am
Back to Top
SIXPAK View Drop Down
AMC Apprentice
AMC Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: Apr/05/2009
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 56
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SIXPAK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug/29/2014 at 9:44am
If you are serious about doing a 4.0 head swap I would consider dropping in the whole 4.0 instead of just doing a head swap. if you swap the 4.0 head on the 258 block you have to plug some casting holes in the head otherwise it will leak water everywhere. And 4.0 heads have larger valves and with the smaller bore of the 258 (3.75 to the 3.88 of the 4.0) I am not saying just doing a head swap is not worth it because it is. I think you would be better off swapping the entire motor power wise. Now you could take the 4.0 head, block, and pistons and swap the 258 crank in and come up with a 275 inch motor.
Sand is for Racing Asphalt is for getting there!
Back to Top
Wrambler View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Jul/02/2007
Location: West Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 4199
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Wrambler Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug/29/2014 at 10:03am
If you want to
A. Keep the 258
B. Install 4.0L head
Then I would
C. use a 2002 up 4.0L head
D. Use a Clifford, or Offenhouser dual port intake, perhaps a 2000 up efi intake swapped to carb? I've not seen any flow results with the last one, but it has been done.
E. Find a set of what I call "bundle of snakes" 2000 up dual outlet shorty header.

The bundle of snakes header is designed to work with the 2000 up head and even though the head has smaller exhaust ports some have stated it flows the best.

And of course a cam of your choice.
300hp? I doubt it, but it will run good once you get it all sorted out.
I would add that I would go with a 97-99 4.0L shortblock if I could fine one and the 2000 up head, being careful to avoid the ones that tend to crack. I forget what design symbol is but there was a redesign in 2002 and a lot of 2000-2002 engines were fixed with the newer head.
Wrambler
69 AMC Rambler
4.0L, 5 speed
2015 Grand Cherokee Limited
2019 Chrysler 300
Back to Top
Snotty View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Mar/28/2014
Location: Chico, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 1247
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snotty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug/29/2014 at 12:12pm
One ting I always caution about, will the smog laws in Illinois allow you to modify that motor and still keep it registered? I would advise checking into that before you do anything.
Son's car: '73 Gremlin X, 401, T-10, Mopar 8.75 rear with 3.23 sure grip. My car: '70 Newport Convertible, 440 automatic
Back to Top
purple72Gremlin View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar
Charter Member

Joined: Jul/01/2007
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 16614
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote purple72Gremlin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug/29/2014 at 12:21pm
Illnois doesnt test anything older than 1996.
Back to Top
FSJunkie View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Jan/09/2011
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Status: Offline
Points: 4742
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FSJunkie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug/29/2014 at 4:55pm
258 + 4.0L = 4.6 stroker.

Only thing I don't like about 4.0L's is they're noisy and don't produce good torque until 3000 RPM.

All the Jeep guys love to say "...lots of low RPM torque..." when it comes to a 4.0L, but those that do have never driven a 258.

I'd have to look at the torque curves, but I wouldn't be surprised if the 258 out-pulls the 4.0L below 2500 RPM. 258's just fall on their face above 3500 RPM. 232's rev out a little better.
1955 Packard
1966 Marlin
1972 Wagoneer
1973 Ambassador
1977 Hornet
1982 Concord D/L
1984 Eagle Limited
Back to Top
Greyhounds_AMX View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Nov/14/2009
Location: Kansas City
Status: Online
Points: 1268
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Greyhounds_AMX Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug/29/2014 at 9:45pm
The 4.0L swap sounds best to me too. You can use the factory headers, and that'll save some $$.

With a more agressive cam and a Clifford intake it'd be alot of fun. You'll need an electric fuel pump, and may want to switch to a 258 water pump to run a V-belt.

Look to Sixpack for good tips - few people have built this engine to the level that he has.
1968 AMX 390 w/T5
Back to Top
carnuck View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Mar/31/2010
Location: Seattle
Status: Offline
Points: 3942
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carnuck Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug/29/2014 at 11:54pm
Originally posted by FSJunkie FSJunkie wrote:

258 + 4.0L = 4.6 stroker.

Only thing I don't like about 4.0L's is they're noisy and don't produce good torque until 3000 RPM.

All the Jeep guys love to say "...lots of low RPM torque..." when it comes to a 4.0L, but those that do have never driven a 258.

I'd have to look at the torque curves, but I wouldn't be surprised if the 258 out-pulls the 4.0L below 2500 RPM. 258's just fall on their face above 3500 RPM. 232's rev out a little better.


The cure is a Baja Beast cam in the 4.0L or run the Renix timing set (it advances the cam timing about 4 degrees over the HO)
Back to Top
Rogue401 View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Nov/26/2010
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 1280
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rogue401 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug/30/2014 at 12:02am
Originally posted by FSJunkie FSJunkie wrote:

258 + 4.0L = 4.6 stroker.

Only thing I don't like about 4.0L's is they're noisy and don't produce good torque until 3000 RPM.

All the Jeep guys love to say "...lots of low RPM torque..." when it comes to a 4.0L, but those that do have never driven a 258.

I'd have to look at the torque curves, but I wouldn't be surprised if the 258 out-pulls the 4.0L below 2500 RPM. 258's just fall on their face above 3500 RPM. 232's rev out a little better.

Funny you should mention that they are noisy. Our 97 Cherokee has always been noisy compared to other AMC sixes we've had and don't seem as smooth. I've never been able to determine the noise. I think the injectors make noise. I've replaced the timing chain a couple of times and that helps a little but there is always mechanical and a "chain" noise from the pan.

I think 300 horse would be very optimistic. That would be 1.18 horse per cube inch, a good number for a nice street V8
Back to Top
EagleFreek View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted


Joined: Oct/11/2008
Location: Fayetteville,TN
Status: Offline
Points: 828
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EagleFreek Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug/30/2014 at 12:19am
1986 AMC Eagle Wagon 4.2L/4.0L head, AW4,NP242, Chrysler 8.25" rear. SOLD
1981 AMC Eagle Wagon-As Seen On TV Lost in Transmission

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.145 seconds.
All content of this site Copyright © 2018 TheAMCForum unless otherwise noted, all rights reserved.
PROBLEMS LOGGING IN or REGISTERING:
If you have problems logging in or registering, then please contact a Moderator or