Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.
|
3 speed clutchless, How does it work |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |
al1630
AMC Apprentice Joined: Oct/05/2017 Location: Boise, Idaho Status: Offline Points: 174 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Wow! I never knew the E Stick worked like that! Between that and the Twin-Stick, AMC sure tried some unique transmission options. I agree with tomj, please make some videos, I really want to see one in action!
|
|
Alex
1963 Rambler American 440H |
|
matty 401
AMC Addicted Joined: Jul/06/2007 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 1727 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
in the 50's Dodge had a stick with a torque converter
|
|
72 matador 401 the beast
79 concord 2 door 72 matador 304 grasshopper 68 Rogue 406 93 Cherokee 4.0 5 speed |
|
6PakBee
Supporter of TheAMCForum Charter Member Joined: Jul/01/2007 Location: North Dakota Status: Offline Points: 5458 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hmm. Sounds like shade of the Hudson Vacumotive clutch, only with engine oil pressure rather than vacuum. It's amazing what companies did in an attempt to simply transmission/shifting mechanisms prior to the Hydra-Matic.
|
|
Roger Gazur
1969 'B' Scheme SC/Rambler 1970 RWB 4-spd Machine 1970 Sonic Silver auto AMX All project cars. Forum Cockroach |
|
farna
Supporter of TheAMCForum Moderator Lost Dealership Project Joined: Jul/08/2007 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 19689 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes, it was throw-back tech -- about one fourth the cost of a $300 auto (option price -- E-stick was around $60. so as little under 1/4th auto price). Not much today, but in the early 60s a new American with three on the tree (and a clutch!) only costs a bit over $1800. Consider that the cheapest cars now still cost from a third to half a year's pay for the average person ($60K in 2016 for the US, $6200 in 1963), which is still about right ($2K for a 63 American in 63, $18K for a 2018 Ford Focus -- close enough to 1/3!). So an auto trans was around 15% more -- that would be $2700 more on the Focus, though that option is only $1100 (about 6% more). The Fiesta is $3K less than the Focus, but I'd say it would be more comparable to a Metropolitan of 63... but even if you use it the cost isn't much below a third of the yearly average income.
Edited by farna - Dec/21/2018 at 6:14am |
|
Frank Swygert
|
|
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |