Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.
|
Tie-Rod interference (almost)? |
Post Reply |
Author | |
67RogueX-Code
AMC Addicted Joined: Jan/21/2009 Location: Sylvania, Ohio Status: Offline Points: 1302 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: Jul/11/2014 at 12:04am |
Gotta question guys.
So, while installing the steering on my Rogue tonight, and I had to remove the grease fittings from the inner ends of both left and right tie-rods, because they were hitting "stand" on the cross-member that the motor-mount attaches to...
It's pretty hard to see in this picture, but... anybody else run into this ?
|
|
Bob Wilcox
67RogueX-Code |
|
MARTINSR
AMC Addicted Joined: Sep/08/2009 Location: SF bay area Ca Status: Offline Points: 670 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I can not believe how close that tie rod end is to that lower control arm bolt on my 59 American as well, just like that, it blows me away. I figured, it wasn't hitting it, so I left it that way and drive it every day. The darn tie rod end HAS hit the inside of the stock wheels on the car, I don't get it. It has barely touched and didn't cause any trouble so I have left that alone as well.
Yeah, I dont' get it, if everything is perfect (I rebuilt the idler arm) it should be ok. Now, that steering box and linkage is behind the suspension on that car right? On my American it's in front. Can you post a photo of the suspension on your car showing it a little better as far as how that tie rod is made up? Brian
|
|
1959 Rambler American daily driver. And I mean EVERY SINGLE day.
|
|
67RogueX-Code
AMC Addicted Joined: Jan/21/2009 Location: Sylvania, Ohio Status: Offline Points: 1302 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
...steering linkage is in front...
|
|
Bob Wilcox
67RogueX-Code |
|
MARTINSR
AMC Addicted Joined: Sep/08/2009 Location: SF bay area Ca Status: Offline Points: 670 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Just like the American, it's wild how close it is. I see nothing that can change it. If the idler arm or steering box has any wear at all, it will hit I would think. But it works as is, I drive it every day like that. And to clarify how close is close, we are talking a 1/16" or so away.
Brian
|
|
1959 Rambler American daily driver. And I mean EVERY SINGLE day.
|
|
67RogueX-Code
AMC Addicted Joined: Jan/21/2009 Location: Sylvania, Ohio Status: Offline Points: 1302 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
...so, do you run with a plug, rather than the grease-fitting?
|
|
Bob Wilcox
67RogueX-Code |
|
MARTINSR
AMC Addicted Joined: Sep/08/2009 Location: SF bay area Ca Status: Offline Points: 670 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The grease fittings are there, it didn't seem to be close right at the grease fitting. I will take another look at it again though, you have me thinking. :D As I remember it only hit if you rotated the drag link on the ball joints, if you did that it would hit. But I guess under driving conditions it doesn't get rotated like that and stays where it's "happy".
Brian
|
|
1959 Rambler American daily driver. And I mean EVERY SINGLE day.
|
|
67RogueX-Code
AMC Addicted Joined: Jan/21/2009 Location: Sylvania, Ohio Status: Offline Points: 1302 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
There's really no need to check... this discussion has already verified that they normally are VERY close... I'll just need to figure out (once the car's standing on it's own wheels, not on the rotissery) whether to leave the grease-fittings in or run with them out.
Thanks for your help.
|
|
Bob Wilcox
67RogueX-Code |
|
nickleone
AMC Addicted Joined: Oct/04/2008 Location: westminster co Status: Offline Points: 1446 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Take a grinder to the "stand" and clearance it.
Nick |
|
nick
401 71 Gremlin pro rally car sold 390 V8 SX/4 pro rally car sold 1962 Classic SW T5 4 wheel disc brakes |
|
farna
Supporter of TheAMCForum Moderator Lost Dealership Project Joined: Jul/08/2007 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 19689 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The original tie rod ends for the 58-63 Americans (well, at least the 61-63) had a nylon insert -- no grease fittings. They would last 80K miles or so easily, I've had cars with 100K that weren't loose. Maybe that was why. I know the outer ends fit very close to the wheels -- aftermarket aluminum wheels are usually too thick to use on the small 58-63 Americans. Have to use 15" steel wheels (or some 16" today!).
I thought that was pretty cutting edge for the late 50s/early 60s. I remember in the early 90s reading a flyer at a truck shop that had a process to fix worn tie rod ends rather than replace them. They injected a melted nylon in through the grease fitting hole, encasing the ball and taking up any slack. Made me think about the American tie rod ends. The only thing is the ball might not be perfectly centered and there would be some grease residue mixed in. Maybe the melted nylon would soften and displace most of the grease, but would be hard to keep the ball centered. I suppose pressure would equalize around it. Coverage wouldn't be perfectly uniform, but as long as some was around the ball it wouldn't matter if it was a bit thicker on one side than the other. Would still last a long time if my experience with the early 60s Americans is any clue. Would be a great way to fix some of the old cars with expensive, hard to find tie rod ends. Wonder if anyone still does this? |
|
Frank Swygert
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |