Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.
|
Wheels/Rims 17x8 |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | ||
einbier
Supporter of TheAMCForum Joined: Aug/04/2011 Location: Ohio Status: Offline Points: 463 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: Apr/08/2018 at 11:10am |
|
Is anybody running a 17 x 8" wheel in the front of a 70 Javelin?
If so what size tire are you running and what is the back space on your wheel? Trying to determine what size tire and back space I could run. Thanks |
||
1970 Javelin Mark Donohue
1970 Hornet Shirley Shahan (Tribute) |
||
WesternRed
AMC Addicted Joined: Aug/03/2010 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 5787 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Mine is a 69 so you would have to account for the suspension difference, but 17x8, 4.5” backspacing, 235/45/17 tyres.
|
||
einbier
Supporter of TheAMCForum Joined: Aug/04/2011 Location: Ohio Status: Offline Points: 463 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Nobody else is running a different wheel tire combo than factory hard to believe.
|
||
1970 Javelin Mark Donohue
1970 Hornet Shirley Shahan (Tribute) |
||
billd
Moderator Group Forum Administrator Joined: Jun/27/2007 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 30894 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Not hard to believe - you have to be careful about changing how things are set up or you make it dangerous - bump steer, brake steer, and so on. SAI, for example, the factory calculated exactly where the steering axis line would intersect a line through the tire - too far above the road and you have trouble, too far below the road and you have trouble. Almost all were designed for the intersection to be a bit below the surface of the road. Move the wheel out and you shift that line intersection and change how the car brakes, steers and behaves in emergency situations.
That's the technical reasons I won't do that sort of thing - I know too much about suspension and steering design...... the other reason is personal opinion so I'll just not mention it ;-)
|
||
purple72Gremlin
AMC Addicted Charter Member Joined: Jul/01/2007 Location: Illinois Status: Offline Points: 16591 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
And the rubber band tires.....changes everything... backspace, offsets...be careful...
|
||
304-dude
AMC Addicted Joined: Sep/29/2008 Location: Central Illinoi Status: Offline Points: 9081 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Contact CamJam, i think he runs 8 wide rims.
If not shootenist, as he has a custom 70 Javelin. |
||
71 Javelin SST body
390 69 crank, 70 block & heads NASCAR SB2 rods & pistons 78 Jeep TH400 w/ 2.76 Low 50/50 Ford-AMC Suspension 79 F150 rear & 8.8 axles Ford Racing 3.25 gears & 9" /w Detroit locker |
||
billd
Moderator Group Forum Administrator Joined: Jun/27/2007 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 30894 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I was in a tire store waiting for some tires I had bought to be mounted and was reading an interesting article in the tall wheels, thin tires - it was a Tire industry magazine and guess what they were warning against....... yeah, their bottom line was be extremely careful using them on older cars with steering and suspension not designed for them. They gave far more technical reasoning and information than I can even remember, but it stuck in my mind because here was a tire shop with a car/tire magazine suggesting to not be so quick to use the short sidewall tires on older vehicles.. They were talking about emergency handling, emergency braking, etc. and the stresses that were often applied to parts not designed to handle said stresses. They of course said what I believe - it's done for the "cool" factor - not to improve anything about the car (because it won't, according to them) - it was all about looks and style. So in that case - it's all opinion because technically, it's a "no". Some folks like the looks, others not so much. Since it's an absolutely not recommended thing technically, it's up to those who have done it to suggest sizes, etc. |
||
purple72Gremlin
AMC Addicted Charter Member Joined: Jul/01/2007 Location: Illinois Status: Offline Points: 16591 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
WesternRed
AMC Addicted Joined: Aug/03/2010 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 5787 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
So in the 70's you would happily put 245/50/14 up front and 265/50/14 out the back on a mix of 7" and 8" rims. I can't see that 235/45/17 and 275/40/17 is much of a stretch in terms of sidewall and not a massive change in overall diameter either. "Most" classic muscle car guys are not looking to go crazy with wheel and tyre size, just something that has slightly more modern wheel and tyre sizing for better appearance and wider availability of tyres, particularly if chasing something with more grip and performance use in mind.
I can buy a 235/45/17 for $100, the old 245/50/14 is now a specialty tyre and costs $250-300 each. One of the biggest benefits I have obtained from the 17" wheels is a little more ground clearance up front so that the headers are not getting smashed on every bump in the road. |
||
343sharpstick
AMC Addicted Joined: Mar/10/2010 Location: Wisconsin Status: Offline Points: 554 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
einbier, There are many people running 17's on AMC's. I've never had any other size on my car since I've restored it.
The 70 and later front suspension will easily fit a 17x8 with 4.5 Backspace as WesternRed has mentioned. As stated overall diameter with modern tire size is no different that a fat side-wall 14 or 15. I would make sure that with the added grip of modern tires, be sure all of your suspension bushings are in good shape, especially the strut rod bushing as that get's the most abuse. Also, I would try to dial in more caster than originally specified. Edited by 343sharpstick - Apr/13/2018 at 10:08am |
||
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |