TheAMCForum.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > The Garage > AMC V8 Engine Repair and Modifications
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 11.5 to 1 on pump gas
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Click for TheAMCForum Rules / Click for PDF version of Forum Rules
Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.

11.5 to 1 on pump gas

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
Author
Message
matty 401 View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Jul/06/2007
Location: Iowa
Status: Offline
Points: 1727
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote matty 401 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 11.5 to 1 on pump gas
    Posted: Apr/03/2015 at 8:59am
what is the most you can run for compression  and still be on pump gas ? was thinking of changing the compression in my Beast 72 Matador 2 door  401 727 trans and 456 gears 
72 matador 401 the beast
79 concord 2 door
72 matador 304 grasshopper
68 Rogue 406
93 Cherokee 4.0 5 speed

Back to Top
uncljohn View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Jan/03/2013
Location: Peoria AZ
Status: Offline
Points: 5394
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote uncljohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Apr/03/2015 at 9:23am
The answer to that question is in part based on the available octane rating of the some what questionable term "Pump Gas"
Here where I live, Premium "Pump Gas" is 91 octane, and with 91 octane 11:1 compression is wishful thinking.
70 390 5spd Donohue
74 Hornet In restoration
76 Hornet, 5.7L Mercury Marine Power
80 Fuel Injected I6 Spirit
74 232 I-6, 4bbl, 270HL Isky Cam
Back to Top
matty 401 View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Jul/06/2007
Location: Iowa
Status: Offline
Points: 1727
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote matty 401 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Apr/03/2015 at 10:02am
not saying it will be 11.5 to 1 just trying to figure out what i can go to with the current gas we have without going to race fuel  car is 8.25 to 1 now 
72 matador 401 the beast
79 concord 2 door
72 matador 304 grasshopper
68 Rogue 406
93 Cherokee 4.0 5 speed

Back to Top
69AMX364 View Drop Down
AMC Apprentice
AMC Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: Jun/07/2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 150
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 69AMX364 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Apr/03/2015 at 10:02am
You can run 11:1 on pump gas. Will you enjoy it? No. It would take much more work and money to get it to run good then what you will get out of it. A good friend of mine put together a 440 6 pack engine with 11:1 in the early 80's and after a while he had to confess that it was a mistake and that he should have gone with 10:1 instead for high test gas at that time.

Now if you plan on E85 gas as pump gas then you should be able to easily run even higher, however you could not put anything else in instead, like 91 octane.

One of the better things that I did on my 69 AMX is to use a 360 engine from a Wagoneer which will run on 87 and give NO problems at all. I also loved my MSD rev limiter and how that worked with a manual transmission and being driven hard. I loved having a 3000 chip for when someone else might drive the car.
Back to Top
69AMX364 View Drop Down
AMC Apprentice
AMC Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: Jun/07/2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 150
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 69AMX364 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Apr/03/2015 at 10:08am
May I suggest perhaps a better camshaft might be a choice, to get better performance from what you have?
Back to Top
Traveller View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted


Joined: Feb/26/2011
Location: Idaho
Status: Offline
Points: 1011
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Traveller Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Apr/03/2015 at 10:33am
Static compression isn't the issue, dynamic compression is. Chamber and piston design play a huge factor, as does how you set up the quench.   Tight quench and a good quench area on the head and piston are more detonation resistant due to mixture motion reducing dead spots in the chamber that are detonation prone.

Dynamic compression is basically computed from the volume remaining in the cylinder when the intake valve hits the seat on the compression stroke.   The wilder the cam, the less volume there is in the cylinder since the intake valve closes later. This becomes very important when selecting a cam. If you don't have enough static compression, the dynamic won't be high enough to work with the camshaft.   You end up not creating peak cylinder pressures where the cam works best, and you end up with a pig of an engine. Too high a static compression with a small cam, can create too high a cylinder pressure for the fuel and you end up with detonation. It's all about peak cylinder pressure in the RPM range you want the engine to work best at.

You need to figure out what you want the engine to do first, before you decide on a static compression ratio since there are way too many factors to just say "use this compression ratio and you won't have problems".   

A 9:1 engine for the street can be made to run fantastic, and even in hot weather you will probably be able to get away with mid-grade.

You'd be surprised what 8.25:1 can do with the right cam and some minor head work.



Edited by Traveller - Apr/03/2015 at 10:36am
Back to Top
69AMX364 View Drop Down
AMC Apprentice
AMC Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: Jun/07/2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 150
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 69AMX364 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Apr/03/2015 at 10:36am
Well said Traveller.
Back to Top
SKeown View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Jul/30/2009
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 3085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SKeown Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Apr/03/2015 at 10:40am

 There are a number of factors that come into play, such as the cam's duration, Quench (piston to head clearance), ignition timing and the pump gas being used. I feel a dynamic CR ratio of 11.5:1 is very risky and feel 10;1 to be a more practical approach in most cases. I run 10.8:1 with a lot of cam duration, aluminum heads,.040 quench and 93 gas. With a similar combination at 11;1 and iron heads I saw evidence of detonation in some cylinders.

 SKeown 
Back to Top
RAZER View Drop Down
AMC Apprentice
AMC Apprentice


Joined: Jun/14/2014
Location: AZ
Status: Offline
Points: 147
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote RAZER Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Apr/03/2015 at 10:50am
Originally posted by Traveller Traveller wrote:

Static compression isn't the issue, dynamic compression is. Chamber and piston design play a huge factor, as does how you set up the quench.   Tight quench and a good quench area on the head and piston are more detonation resistant due to mixture motion reducing dead spots in the chamber that are detonation prone.

Dynamic compression is basically computed from the volume remaining in the cylinder when the intake valve hits the seat on the compression stroke.   The wilder the cam, the less volume there is in the cylinder since the intake valve closes later. This becomes very important when selecting a cam. If you don't have enough static compression, the dynamic won't be high enough to work with the camshaft.   You end up not creating peak cylinder pressures where the cam works best, and you end up with a pig of an engine. Too high a static compression with a small cam, can create too high a cylinder pressure for the fuel and you end up with detonation. It's all about peak cylinder pressure in the RPM range you want the engine to work best at.

You need to figure out what you want the engine to do first, before you decide on a static compression ratio since there are way too many factors to just say "use this compression ratio and you won't have problems".   

A 9:1 engine for the street can be made to run fantastic, and even in hot weather you will probably be able to get away with mid-grade.

You'd be surprised what 8.25:1 can do with the right cam and some minor head work.


Ya but the 8.25:1 in these engines has the piston .035 to .038 down in the whole, and with a .041 to .045 head gasket how does that take advantage of a cam and head work. This is a serious question I really want to know if some of you have made good HP gains on a stock bottom 360 or 401 with the low compression??
Back to Top
SKeown View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Jul/30/2009
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 3085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SKeown Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Apr/03/2015 at 11:11am

 It's not unusual for someone addressing detonation by increasing the head gasket thickness only to find it made their situation worse.

 SKeown
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 4.141 seconds.
All content of this site Copyright © 2018 TheAMCForum unless otherwise noted, all rights reserved.
PROBLEMS LOGGING IN or REGISTERING:
If you have problems logging in or registering, then please contact a Moderator or