TheAMCForum.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > The Garage > AMC V8 Engine Repair and Modifications
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 401 crank is reground, does it need rebalance
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Click for TheAMCForum Rules / Click for PDF version of Forum Rules
Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.

401 crank is reground, does it need rebalance

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message
Trader View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted


Joined: May/15/2018
Location: Ontario
Status: Offline
Points: 6881
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Trader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep/22/2020 at 11:52am
6PakBee, in your calculations did you put the bearings back in the rods? I get 0.272g total, all 8, with a 0.010" undercut crankshaft and putting tri-metal bearings back in. That's 0.034g per rod so one of us likely has the 0's wrong through the conversions. Regardless it is nothing to be concerned about for rebalancing. 

Most of the bearing is steel backing. ). 0.030" is what I used for bearing coating as per Clevite.
 
Aluminum bearing material would be slightly more but they are not available.

Main bearings don't count at all as they are not rotating.
Back to Top
rang-a-stang View Drop Down
AMC Nut
AMC Nut
Avatar

Joined: Sep/25/2018
Location: Camarillo, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 272
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rang-a-stang Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep/22/2020 at 4:29pm
Originally posted by 6PakBee 6PakBee wrote:

Just for giggles I calculated how much imbalance there would be with a 0.010 cut on the rods.  It turns out that it's about 3 1/2 grams per rod.  Unless you are going for an 8500 rpm motor, I wouldn't worry about that.  This is assuming your initial balance was within 2 grams.
I think it was balanced to the gram. My motor does see 5500 RPM but I have my EFI set to cut out at 5600 so it never goes over that. 
Originally posted by SCRAGTOP SCRAGTOP wrote:

As the original question was about balancing...
...
If you grind the crank .010 under on the MAINS what have you changed in the balance equation? Nothing. You removed .005 from each side of the crank journal. Nothing changes. Weight of the rods/pistons/pins/rings FROM CENTERLINE didn't change. This holds true for the MAINS.

If you grind .010 from the rod journals, you will have removed a portion of metal that is offset from centerline and you will need to rebalance. I believe it was mentioned in a post above that it was miniscule and it is. Your balance may not change enough to justify spending $$$ to rebalance. Now, I say that for a street motor. If you are on the strip and spinning into 8K regularly, I recommend re-balancing.
Copy all. My thought was if I am removing about the same metal from all 4 throws (all 8 rod/pistons/pins/rings), they should still be, generally, about balanced, right? I do not see 8K rpm, and only rarely see anything over 4K. 
Originally posted by Trader Trader wrote:

6PakBee, in your calculations did you put the bearings back in the rods? I get 0.272g total, all 8, with a 0.010" undercut crankshaft and putting tri-metal bearings back in. That's 0.034g per rod so one of us likely has the 0's wrong through the conversions. Regardless it is nothing to be concerned about for rebalancing. 

Most of the bearing is steel backing. ). 0.030" is what I used for bearing coating as per Clevite.
 
Aluminum bearing material would be slightly more but they are not available.

Main bearings don't count at all as they are not rotating.
Copy all. Great news! I wish I was as good with my math wizardry as you guys. You put this into perspective real quick.
79 Cherokee, 401
Back to Top
6PakBee View Drop Down
Supporter of TheAMCForum
Supporter of TheAMCForum
Avatar
Charter Member

Joined: Jul/01/2007
Location: North Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 5457
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 6PakBee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep/22/2020 at 5:42pm
Originally posted by rang-a-stang rang-a-stang wrote:

Originally posted by 6PakBee 6PakBee wrote:

Just for giggles I calculated how much imbalance there would be with a 0.010 cut on the rods.  It turns out that it's about 3 1/2 grams per rod.  Unless you are going for an 8500 rpm motor, I wouldn't worry about that.  This is assuming your initial balance was within 2 grams.
I think it was balanced to the gram. My motor does see 5500 RPM but I have my EFI set to cut out at 5600 so it never goes over that. 
Originally posted by SCRAGTOP SCRAGTOP wrote:

As the original question was about balancing...
...
If you grind the crank .010 under on the MAINS what have you changed in the balance equation? Nothing. You removed .005 from each side of the crank journal. Nothing changes. Weight of the rods/pistons/pins/rings FROM CENTERLINE didn't change. This holds true for the MAINS.

If you grind .010 from the rod journals, you will have removed a portion of metal that is offset from centerline and you will need to rebalance. I believe it was mentioned in a post above that it was miniscule and it is. Your balance may not change enough to justify spending $$$ to rebalance. Now, I say that for a street motor. If you are on the strip and spinning into 8K regularly, I recommend re-balancing.
Copy all. My thought was if I am removing about the same metal from all 4 throws (all 8 rod/pistons/pins/rings), they should still be, generally, about balanced, right? I do not see 8K rpm, and only rarely see anything over 4K. 
Originally posted by Trader Trader wrote:

6PakBee, in your calculations did you put the bearings back in the rods? I get 0.272g total, all 8, with a 0.010" undercut crankshaft and putting tri-metal bearings back in. That's 0.034g per rod so one of us likely has the 0's wrong through the conversions. Regardless it is nothing to be concerned about for rebalancing. 

Most of the bearing is steel backing. ). 0.030" is what I used for bearing coating as per Clevite.
 
Aluminum bearing material would be slightly more but they are not available.

Main bearings don't count at all as they are not rotating.
Copy all. Great news! I wish I was as good with my math wizardry as you guys. You put this into perspective real quick.


Trader, you are absolutely correct.  I neglected to consider that whatever is removed from the crank throws is made up by the increased bearing thickness.  So the actual difference would depend to a large part on the different densities of the crank and the bearing materials.  In the end, as you so correctly pointed out, the difference would be insignificant.
Roger Gazur
1969 'B' Scheme SC/Rambler
1970 RWB 4-spd Machine
1970 Sonic Silver auto AMX

All project cars.

Forum Cockroach
Back to Top
BassBoat View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted


Joined: Aug/29/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BassBoat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep/22/2020 at 7:59pm
before you worry about your oil pressure, try changing your oil.  I have run 20W50 and found 10 psi difference between Kendall GT1 and Valvoline.  I have run Rotella 15W40 with success.  My street car ran on Mobil 1 15W50 for the last 20 years and has really loose bearings and oil pressure is 40 hot idle and 60 plus with any rpm.  I recently changed to Mobil 1 0W40 European spec based on the oil wear testing data posted elsewhere on this forum.  I am still about 60 psi so maybe lost 5 psi with the nominally lighter oil.  My main bearing clearance is between 3 and 3 and a half, with the rear main almost 5.  So I don't think bearing clearance on the crank is your problem unless you are running 10W30.   Cam bearings can cause problems, as others have mentioned lifters can allegedly be a problem although I personally have not had issues.  Oil Filters can be a problem.  Back in the day the dealer told me AMC, AC or Fram.  Fram has had reported problems, but I still have good luck with AC and K&N filters.  I wish you the best.
BB
Back to Top
Trader View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted


Joined: May/15/2018
Location: Ontario
Status: Offline
Points: 6881
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Trader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep/22/2020 at 10:45pm
As for engine oil change, personal opinion, is to go to a 5W40. If you read the specifications on 5W40's of Mobil, Quaker State and Valvoline, they are better cold and hot then their 5W30's.
Cannot explain it, just reading the specifications, but over a 15Wx or 20Wx, they would be my first "go to", to try.
Better cold start, higher shear points and better hot viscosity temperatures then their 5W30's!
All well rated oils.
Add - SN Plus only.
Back to Top
rang-a-stang View Drop Down
AMC Nut
AMC Nut
Avatar

Joined: Sep/25/2018
Location: Camarillo, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 272
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rang-a-stang Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep/23/2020 at 1:10pm
That all makes sense. 

I think the bottom line is, my oil pressure is too low and I need to open the engine up to find out why. Maybe it's bearing clearances, maybe it's lifters, maybe it's oil pump, maybe it's oil, maybe it's a little of all those; but the engine needs to come out to verify. I am just to paranoid about damaging my crank. I am hopeful that I will not have to regrind my crank, though (after the discussion we all had in this thread) and even if I do, I won't have to re-balance.

Oil filter: I have been running Baldwin B9s since a REALLY bad experience with a FRAM on cam break in. This time I ordered a WIX, though (it's sitting on the shelf waiting to go on after the engine comes out/goes back in). Oil: I think I have Castrol GTX Conventional 20W50 in there right now. I know it's conventional 20W50 but I am not 100% positive it is Castrol GTX...
79 Cherokee, 401
Back to Top
rang-a-stang View Drop Down
AMC Nut
AMC Nut
Avatar

Joined: Sep/25/2018
Location: Camarillo, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 272
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rang-a-stang Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct/11/2020 at 8:27pm
Started a new thread with my inspection. Follow along here:

79 Cherokee, 401
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.297 seconds.
All content of this site Copyright © 2018 TheAMCForum unless otherwise noted, all rights reserved.
PROBLEMS LOGGING IN or REGISTERING:
If you have problems logging in or registering, then please contact a Moderator or