TheAMCForum.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > The Garage > AMC V8 Engine Repair and Modifications
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 1973 Ambassador Fuel efficiency issue
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Click for TheAMCForum Rules / Click for PDF version of Forum Rules
Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.

1973 Ambassador Fuel efficiency issue

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Message
TheAmbassador73 View Drop Down
AMC Fan
AMC Fan
Avatar

Joined: May/09/2017
Location: North Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TheAmbassador73 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 1973 Ambassador Fuel efficiency issue
    Posted: May/09/2017 at 7:20pm
Hello all this is my first post to the forums, however not my first encounter with an American Motors car. About a year and a half ago I sold off my old 76 Gremlin, was my favorite car that I've had by far, but she who shall not be questioned saw it as an eyesore and a horrible waste of my time, so it had to goCry. Ever since that encounter with the Gremlin I've been itching for a Javelin or a Marlin or something of the likes to pop up for a steal and a half on craigslist, and one did! a 1973 AMC Ambassador with the 360 V8, bought for the price of $850. however, again, she who shall not be questioned is complaining, about all the gas that this fine machine eats up, I really don't have an issue with it, but my mother does, shes giving me two months to find a way to make this car more fuel efficient than it is or it has to go, as of right now I only do average of 35miles a day and I have to refill her tank every three days. I have no issue with that, but then again I'm not the one paying for gas at the end of the day. I've asked many people how to get this car running more fuel efficiently, one said "buy a new engine and transmission", others said "extend the gas tank" or "turbo it! the more air you get in the cylinder the less fuel you'll burn" I think the more air you have in the cylinder, a matching amount of fuel comes in as well. I've also considered buying a 232 straight six and swapping it in there, my favorite little peppy engine from the Gremlin. But any advise that anyone here can give me is greatly appreciated, this may be the deciding factor between finding the solution or settling for what she who shall not be questioned wants and getting a civic, uh, just typing the name gives me the heebie jeebies.
Back to Top
Buzzman72 View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Sep/15/2009
Location: Southern IN
Status: Offline
Points: 2726
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Buzzman72 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/09/2017 at 7:50pm
You're right. More air in requires more fuel in. That takes the turbo out of the equation. It also limits your options to changing to an overdrive transmission, or changing the differential gears.
Buzzman72...void where prohibited, your mileage may vary, objects in mirror may be closer than they appear, and alcohol may intensify any side effects.
Back to Top
TheAmbassador73 View Drop Down
AMC Fan
AMC Fan
Avatar

Joined: May/09/2017
Location: North Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TheAmbassador73 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/09/2017 at 7:55pm
aww shoot, well, I can swap an engine no problem but I don't know the least bit about transmissions, those aren't exactly my forte, but I'll have to look into that, I don't know how it'd mate in where the automatic transmission was, but I guess I can only find out from here on in, eh?
Back to Top
Buzzman72 View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Sep/15/2009
Location: Southern IN
Status: Offline
Points: 2726
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Buzzman72 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/09/2017 at 8:04pm
Never said it would be easy. But it would be worth it.
Buzzman72...void where prohibited, your mileage may vary, objects in mirror may be closer than they appear, and alcohol may intensify any side effects.
Back to Top
WARBED View Drop Down
Supporter of TheAMCForum
Supporter of TheAMCForum
Avatar

Joined: Feb/12/2011
Location: Edinburg TX
Status: Offline
Points: 1688
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WARBED Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/09/2017 at 8:20pm
So by my calculations 35 miles a day for three days and most likely a 19 gallon tank, That comes out to 5.5 miles per gallon.  The best I ever got with a 360 in a 72 Matador was 22 Highway and that was amazing. You need a good tune up. Start with a compression and leak down check. If those numbers are good perform a tune up and carb rebuild + all filters. It has to be running very rich with those numbers. 
59 American 2dr S/W. 70 390 AMX. 70 232 javelin. Kelvinator fridge ice cold beer storage.
Back to Top
ccowx View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted


Joined: Nov/03/2010
Location: Yukon
Status: Offline
Points: 3510
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ccowx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/09/2017 at 10:36pm
You need a new "she who must not be questioned" is what you really need. Mine insisted that the Javelin(all 6-8 mpg of her!) needed to be painted and made driveable. Now THAT is the woman you need!

Chris 
Back to Top
amcenthusiast View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Jul/02/2012
Location: SW Atlanta GA
Status: Offline
Points: 1778
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote amcenthusiast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/09/2017 at 11:06pm
The female? -read book named "The Five Love Languages".

The car? -get one of Dave Emmanuel's books on carburetors; any one of these will have enough info to absorb to form a better understanding of carburetors. IMO, he tends to promote whatever carb he's explaining which is positive but leaves the context of comparison for the individual (you absorb the info on carb circuitry, then you decide what carb you want from there)

Yes there are more fuel efficient carburetors, than the ones many early seventies US cars came with.

Truth is, US automakers were more concerned about staying legal with the emission control laws than they were about gas mileage. And as fleet gas mileage laws came into play, AMC began moving into hot selling Jeep Division which had less restrictive laws. (IMO, crude/oversimplified explanation)

Study Holley Economaster line of carbs.

Study Rochester Vari-Jet carbs.

You may be able to find a used one in fair condition, rebuild it and do better than stock.

Either of these will need mods to make the trans link work right.




Edited by amcenthusiast - May/09/2017 at 11:10pm
443 XRV8 Gremlin YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=2DmFOKRuzUc
XRV8 Race Parts website: http://amcramblermarlin.1colony.com/
Back to Top
SensibleSpectaculars View Drop Down
AMC Nut
AMC Nut
Avatar

Joined: Jul/25/2010
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 472
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SensibleSpectaculars Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/09/2017 at 11:11pm
Really the terms "1973 Ambassador" and "fuel efficiency" do not belong in the same sentence. :) Normal for these cars would be about 12-13 mpg overall. That's about what I get with my '71. From road tests I've read from back in the day there was not a whole lot of difference in mpg between the available engines.

This was the worst time period for gas mileage. We had a new '73 Hornet back then (258 six with automatic) and even that would only get about 15 mpg.
Back to Top
FSJunkie View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Jan/09/2011
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Status: Offline
Points: 4742
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FSJunkie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/09/2017 at 11:31pm
It pretty much doesn't matter what engine powers the car, because if the car requires 50 horsepower to push down the road at a certain speed, then that is the horsepower that the engine produces. It doesn't matter what engine. What DOES matter is the efficiency of that engine. A 232 and a 360 will use the same amount of fuel to produce the same horsepower if they both have the same efficiency, and they actually do have about the same efficiency.

That's at steady cruising speeds. The story is different while accelerating:

Larger engines are capable of accelerating the car faster, and drivers usually take advantage of that by having a heavy right foot. That sucks more gas than a smaller engine that is incapable of accelerating as fast and using as much fuel, no matter how heavy the driver's foot is. Smaller engines also usually have more efficient drivetrains that waste less energy. These are the main reasons that smaller engines get better fuel economy, even if just slightly.

A 232 and a 360 will get basically the same fuel economy if you discipline yourself to keep your foot out of the 360.

Increasing fuel economy beyond that would require extensive modifications to the engine to improve efficiency. Even then, truly impressive fuel economy cannot be realized without addressing the inertial and friction losses in the drivetrain and the body of the car. A different transmission and rear axle ratio would be required, along with different tires, vehicle weight reduction, and aerodynamics improvements. The reason that modern cars get such good fuel economy is due to more efficient drivetrains and aerodynamics than it is to the engine, and those things are not easily changed on a 1973 car.
1955 Packard
1966 Marlin
1972 Wagoneer
1973 Ambassador
1977 Hornet
1982 Concord D/L
1984 Eagle Limited
Back to Top
mixed up View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted
Avatar

Joined: Jun/16/2015
Location: Monroe mich
Status: Offline
Points: 2178
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mixed up Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/10/2017 at 1:02am
lets start with spark  plugs. wires . cap and rotor new air filter  then go with the carb rebuild it sounds a little rich on fuel  but that about all you can do like some said the car will only  get about 12 to 15 mpg that doing good  in city driving you might want to try a methanol  injection system that will squeeze a little more out of her there real ez to install put a vacume guage on it to monitor your go fast peddle keep it i the green my dad was a master of fuel milage he installed vacume guages on all is amcs good luck on the quest fo mpg
69 amx 290 auto
65 220 290 4spd
80 ford fairmont
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.188 seconds.
All content of this site Copyright © 2018 TheAMCForum unless otherwise noted, all rights reserved.
PROBLEMS LOGGING IN or REGISTERING:
If you have problems logging in or registering, then please contact a Moderator or