TheAMCForum.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > The Garage > 6 Cylinder Engine Repair and Modifications
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 196 swap for v6?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Click for TheAMCForum Rules / Click for PDF version of Forum Rules
Your donations help keep this valuable resource free and growing. Thank you.

196 swap for v6?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
tyrodtom View Drop Down
AMC Addicted
AMC Addicted


Joined: Sep/14/2007
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 2814
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tyrodtom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/01/2012 at 3:53pm
  The origional GM v6s were the odd fire,  their cranks were made as if you just cut off one of the end rodjournals off a V8,  it had a uneven firing order.
 
  To get a even firing order in a 90 degree V6,  you have to split the rod journals,  which makes for a weak crank,  and still doesn't get rid of all the harmonics.  I though GM did that in about 78.
 
  One of my friends in the USAF had a 65 Olds F-85 with the V6,  that thing would romp at highway speed,  nobody cared if it had a rough idle.
 
  But I got a 76 Olds Starfire for my wife,  with the V6,  but by then Olds V6 was the same as the Buick V6,    Good thing I didn't have to drive it much,  because that's the worse car i've ever owned,  I rate it even below my Yugo.
66 American SW, 66 American 2dr, 82 J10, 70 Hornet, Pound, Va.
Back to Top
farna View Drop Down
Supporter of TheAMCForum
Supporter of TheAMCForum
Avatar
Moderator Lost Dealership Project

Joined: Jul/08/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7103
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote farna Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/01/2012 at 5:30pm
It was the even crank then. That Sunfire was either a 77 or 78 model. According to Wikipedia: "In 1977, Buick devised an innovative "split-pin crankshaft" redesign of the crankshaft, flywheel, and distributor which greatly alleviated the problem, creating a new even-firing version of the engine." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buick_V6#231). I still think the thing was rough, had soft engine mounts. Maybe it was an early 77 with the odd fire model in it? 
Frank Swygert
American Motors Cars Magazine
www.amc-mag.com
Back to Top
Scott McElheney View Drop Down
AMC Apprentice
AMC Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: Jul/08/2007
Location: Monticello, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 216
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Scott McElheney Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/01/2012 at 10:51pm
Originally posted by farna farna wrote:

Maybe it was an early 77 with the odd fire model in it? 

Could be. From the Turbo Regal website:

In 1977, Buick redesigned the firing order to make it a smoother running engine by revising the crank throws. This was a mid-year change, so some odd-fire and some even-fire V6s were made during 1977. The new even-fire engine still retained the same bore spacing as the odd-fire version, so the bores were no longer centered over the rods and the engine had to be under balanced and soft motor mounts were used. The balancing took care of the vertical component of the vibrations and the motor mounts took care of the horizontal component.


As for the original topic, I'd keep it all AMC and put in a newer straight 6. I think one of the worst mistakes the US automakers have made in the last 20-25 years has been to abandon straight 6 engines, especially for trucks. I liked my '92 Ford F150 with the old 300 I-6 much better than my current '06 F150 with the 4-point-whatever liter V-6.
Scott Mc.
'67 Amboat DPL hardtop
'67 Mercury Parklane 'vert w/410 & factory 4-speed (Newest addition to the fleet!)
'70 IH 1200D Travelette
'66 IH Scout 800
'29 Ford Model A
Back to Top
Ken Doyle View Drop Down
AMC Apprentice
AMC Apprentice


Joined: Jun/19/2010
Location: Haledon NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 118
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ken Doyle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May/03/2012 at 5:34pm
I had a '63 660 with a cast-iron OHV 195.6 automatic and I found it to be downright peppy with excellent economy.  It also had no problem at highway speeds.  My 1960 Rambler Six was the same way, sure surprised unsuspecting passengers when I stomped it into the carpet.  As long as you torque the head and adjust the valves once in a while, I found those engines to be bulletproof and well mannered.
 
Ken D.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.328 seconds.
All content of this site Copyright © 2012 TheAMCForum unless otherwise noted, all rights reserved.
PROBLEMS LOGGING IN or REGISTERING:
If you have problems logging in or registering, then please contact a Moderator or